References

1. Goulden H, Morrison E. An equitable future for research and innovation: Building sustained community involvement in knowledge production. The Young Foundation; 2022 Jul.

2. Health Watch. Working with community researchers to achieve change for people | Healthwatch Network. 2022 [cited 2024 Apr 1]. Available from: https://network.healthwatch.co.uk/guidance/2022-09-05/working-communityresearchers-to-achieve-change-people

3. UKRI. How the public is improving research and its impact in society [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Apr 1]. Available from: https://www.ukri.org/blog/how-the-public-isimproving-research-and-its-impact-in-society/

4. Boechler L, Renwick S, Alabi A, de la Torre H, Kumar S, Singh H, et al. Beyond the role of participant: a firsthand account of the experiences of a patient-oriented research team. Research Involvement and Engagement. 2021 Nov 7;7(1):79.

5. Beresford P. User involvement, research and health inequalities: developing new directions. Health Soc Care Community. 2007 Jul;15(4):306–12.

6.Wallerstein N, Duran B. Community-Based Participatory Research Contributions to Intervention Research: The Intersection of Science and Practice to Improve Health Equity. Am J Public Health. 2010 Apr;100(S1):S40–6.

7. Wallerstein NB, Yen IH, Syme SL. Integration of social epidemiology and community-engaged interventions to improve health equity. Am J Public Health. 2011 May;101(5):822–30.

8. Southby K, Coan S, Rushworth S, South J, Bagnall AM, Lam T, et al. The contribution of peer research in evaluating complex public health interventions: examples from two UK community empowerment projects. BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 24;22(1):2164.

9.Woodall J, Cross R, Kinsella K, Bunyan AM. Using peer research processes to understand strategies to support those with severe, multiple and complex health needs. Health Education Journal. 2019 Mar 1;78(2):176–88.

10. Buffel T. Older Coresearchers Exploring Age-Friendly Communities: An “Insider” Perspective on the Benefits and Challenges of Peer-Research. The Gerontologist. 2019 May 17;59(3):538–48.

11. Johnson V. Moving beyond voice in children and young people’s participation. Action Research. 2017 Mar 1;15(1):104–24. 42

12. Walker M, Boni A, Martinez-Vargas C, Cin M. An Epistemological Break: Redefining Participatory Research in Capabilitarian Scholarship. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities. 2022 Jan 2;23(1):1–7.

13. Martinez-Vargas C, Walker M, Melis Cin F, Boni A. A Capabilitarian Participatory Paradigm: Methods, Methodologies and Cosmological Issues and Possibilities. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities. 2022 Jan 2;23(1):8–29.

14. MacKinnon KR, Guta A, Voronka J, Pilling M, Williams CC, Strike C, et al. The Political Economy of Peer Research: Mapping the Possibilities and Precarities of Paying People for Lived Experience. The British Journal of Social Work. 2021 Apr 1;51(3):888–906.

15. Heney V, Poleykett B. The impossibility of engaged research: Complicity and accountability between researchers, ‘publics’ and institutions. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2022;44(S1):179–94.

16. Guta A, Flicker S, Roche B. Governing through community allegiance: a qualitative examination of peer research in community-based participatory research. Critical Public Health. 2013 Dec 1;23(4):432–51.

17. Polanyi MC. Opportunities and Pitfalls of Community-Based Research: A Case Study. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning [Internet]. 2003 Summer;9(3). Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3239521.0009.302

18. Kelly B, Friel S, McShane T, Pinkerton J, Gilligan E. “I haven’t read it, I’ve lived it!” The benefits and challenges of peer research with young people leaving care. Qualitative Social Work. 2020 Jan 1;19(1):108–24.

19. Ross LE, Pilling M, Voronka J, Pitt KA, McLean E, King C, et al. ‘I will play this tokenistic game, I just want something useful for my community’: experiences of and resistance to harms of peer research. Critical Public Health. 2023 Oct 20;1–12.

20. Walsham M. Involving Young Londoners: A review of participatory approaches in the youth sector [Internet]. Trust for London; 2021 Jun. Available from: https://trustforlondon.org.uk/research/involving-young-londoners/

21. Kindon S, Pain R and Kesby M (2007) Participatory action research approaches and methods: connecting people, participation and place. Routledge.

22. London Borough of Tower Hamlets (2019). Community Insights Programme Evaluation. Evaluation report.

23. London Borough of Tower Hamlets (2021). Poverty review. Available from: https://www.towerhamlets.gov.uk/lgnl/community_and_living/Poverty-Review.aspx 43

24. Pain R, Whitman G and Milledge D (2019) Participatory Action Research Toolkit: An Introduction to Using PAR as an Approach to Learning, Research and Action. Practice Guide. Durham University. Available from: https://www.youngfoundation.org/institute-for-communitystudies/repository/participatory-action-research-toolkit-an-introduction-to-using-paras-an-approach-to-learning-research-and-action/#LT-19-06-Participatory-ActionResearch-Toolkit.pdf

25. Yang C and Dibb Z (2020) Peer research in the UK. Insitute for Community Studies, the Young Foundation. Available from: https://youngfoundation.bcdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/TheYoungFoundation-PeerResearchInTheUKfinal-singles.pdf?x48225

26. Lin X, Mobey B, Mullen P et al. (2021) Rent-Move-Repeat: Participatory Action Research Approach. Toynbee Hall. Available from: https://www.toynbeehall.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Rent-Move-RepeatParticipatory-Action-Research-Approach-FINAL.pdf

27. Islam S, Albert A, Haklay M and McEachan R (2022) ActEarly co-production strategy. Available from: https://actearly.org.uk/actearly-co-production-strategy/